Broadband coverage in England
- Postcode speeds
- Broadband coverage in England
Download and upload groups are six separate published averages: under 10, 10 to 30, 30 to 100, 100 to 300, 300 to 900, and 900 and above Mbit/s. Each band keeps its own average. They are not added into one speed. Output areas with fewer than five lines stay suppressed, even though these authority rows are already aggregated by Ofcom.
England is shown from the nations rows of the Ofcom coverage file for January 2026, where full-fibre availability is 81.3% of all premises. Availability counts premises that could order a service on a modelled base. It is not a count of homes that have one, and never a measured speed.
81.3% (published interval 81.2% to 81.4%). This is a rounding bound, not a confidence interval.
A specific address is not checked here. Check an address with Ofcom.
Use the published area, not one address
A specific address is not checked here. Check an address with Ofcom.
The complete published directory is below. Search hides matching rows locally. An unknown name creates no page.
BirminghamLeedsNorth YorkshireCornwallSomersetCounty DurhamManchesterBuckinghamshireWiltshireLiverpoolBradfordBristol, City ofKirkleesBournemouth, Christchurch and PooleCheshire EastDorsetWest NorthamptonshireCheshire West and ChesterEast Riding of YorkshireCroydonNorthumberlandWakefieldNorth NorthamptonshireBarnetWandsworthWestminsterEalingWiganWirralShropshireTower HamletsLambethSouthwarkCoventryDoncasterDudleyCumberlandLeicesterBromleyNottinghamNewcastle upon TyneBrighton and HoveSandwellBrentLewishamStockportSunderlandSeftonCentral BedfordshireSalfordNewhamEnfieldBoltonSouth GloucestershireMilton KeynesKingston upon Hull, City ofEast SuffolkHackneyGreenwichWestmorland and FurnessRotherhamPlymouthMedwayStoke-on-TrentHillingdonDerbyCamdenWalsallIslingtonWolverhamptonWaltham ForestSouthamptonTamesideHaveringHaringeyRedbridgeTraffordHounslowNorth SomersetBexleySwindonNorth TynesideCalderdaleRochdaleGatesheadHarrowWarringtonOldhamSolihullKensington and ChelseaYorkPeterboroughHammersmith and FulhamPortsmouthHerefordshire, County ofStockton-on-TeesMertonBuryColchesterBath and North East SomersetSt. HelensRichmond upon ThamesTelford and WrekinLutonHuntingdonshireSuttonNew ForestWest SuffolkSouthend-on-SeaBasingstoke and DeaneChelmsfordBarking and DagenhamBedfordBasildonArunNorth LincolnshireCharnwoodKing's Lynn and West NorfolkMaidstoneBlackpoolIsle of WightReadingTendringEast DevonWokinghamWealdenSouth CambridgeshireTorbayCanterburySouth TynesideNorth East LincolnshireThanetEast LindseyCherwellBraintreeKnowsleyPrestonWest BerkshireMid SussexWarwickThurrockKingston upon ThamesSouth KestevenStratford-on-AvonEast HertfordshireDacorumMiddlesbroughSouth OxfordshireRedcar and ClevelandSouth NorfolkBrecklandBlackburn with DarwenWindsor and MaidenheadHorshamLancasterOxfordTeignbridgeSwaleStaffordVale of White HorseSt AlbansIpswichReigate and BansteadWychavonChichesterBroadlandNuneaton and BedworthAmber ValleyEastleighNorth HertfordshireExeterHaltonEpping ForestElmbridgeGloucesterNewcastle-under-LymeNorth NorfolkNewark and SherwoodTest ValleyCambridgeGuildfordAshfordWinchesterBassetlawAshfieldCheltenhamEast HampshireStroudWaverleyHavantTonbridge and MallingWyreEast StaffordshireNorwichSloughRushcliffeNorth KestevenDoverGedlingDarlingtonWest OxfordshireChorleyHinckley and BosworthErewashBracknell ForestFolkestone and HytheSouth RibbleTunbridge WellsChesterfieldMansfieldWest LancashireWorthingSevenoaksRugbyNorth DevonMid SuffolkBroxtoweFarehamDartfordWelwyn HatfieldLichfieldSouth DerbyshireNorth West LeicestershireSouth StaffordshireEastbourneNorth East DerbyshireSouth HamsLincolnGreat YarmouthCheck an address with Ofcom
Figures
- Full-fibre availability81.3%January 2026, all premises
- Gigabit availability88.4%January 2026, all premises
- Premises below the service obligation0.9%January 2026, all premises
- Unable to receive 2 Mbit/s0.1%January 2026, all premises
Full-fibre availability: 81.3%
Gigabit availability: 88.4%
Superfast availability: 97.8%
Ultrafast availability: 89.3%
Full-fibre availability: 81.3%
| Measure | Result | Low | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabit availability | 88.4% | 88.3% | 88.5% |
| Premises below the service obligation | 0.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Unable to receive 2 Mbit/s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Superfast availability | 97.8% | 97.7% | 97.9% |
| Ultrafast availability | 89.3% | 89.2% | 89.4% |
| Full-fibre availability | 81.3% | 81.2% | 81.4% |
Published council areas
England
- Amber Valley
- Arun
- Ashfield
- Ashford
- Barking and Dagenham
- Barnet
- Basildon
- Basingstoke and Deane
- Bassetlaw
- Bath and North East Somerset
- Bedford
- Bexley
- Birmingham
- Blackburn with Darwen
- Blackpool
- Bolton
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Bracknell Forest
- Bradford
- Braintree
- Breckland
- Brent
- Brighton and Hove
- Bristol, City of
- Broadland
- Bromley
- Broxtowe
- Buckinghamshire
- Bury
- Calderdale
- Cambridge
- Camden
- Canterbury
- Central Bedfordshire
- Charnwood
- Chelmsford
- Cheltenham
- Cherwell
- Cheshire East
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Chesterfield
- Chichester
- Chorley
- Colchester
- Cornwall
- County Durham
- Coventry
- Croydon
- Cumberland
- Dacorum
- Darlington
- Dartford
- Derby
- Doncaster
- Dorset
- Dover
- Dudley
- Ealing
- East Devon
- East Hampshire
- East Hertfordshire
- East Lindsey
- East Riding of Yorkshire
- East Staffordshire
- East Suffolk
- Eastbourne
- Eastleigh
- Elmbridge
- Enfield
- Epping Forest
- Erewash
- Exeter
- Fareham
- Folkestone and Hythe
- Gateshead
- Gedling
- Gloucester
- Great Yarmouth
- Greenwich
- Guildford
- Hackney
- Halton
- Hammersmith and Fulham
- Haringey
- Harrow
- Havant
- Havering
- Herefordshire, County of
- Hillingdon
- Hinckley and Bosworth
- Horsham
- Hounslow
- Huntingdonshire
- Ipswich
- Isle of Wight
- Islington
- Kensington and Chelsea
- King's Lynn and West Norfolk
- Kingston upon Hull, City of
- Kingston upon Thames
- Kirklees
- Knowsley
- Lambeth
- Lancaster
- Leeds
- Leicester
- Lewisham
- Lichfield
- Lincoln
- Liverpool
- Luton
- Maidstone
- Manchester
- Mansfield
- Medway
- Merton
- Mid Suffolk
- Mid Sussex
- Middlesbrough
- Milton Keynes
- New Forest
- Newark and Sherwood
- Newcastle upon Tyne
- Newcastle-under-Lyme
- Newham
- North Devon
- North East Derbyshire
- North East Lincolnshire
- North Hertfordshire
- North Kesteven
- North Lincolnshire
- North Norfolk
- North Northamptonshire
- North Somerset
- North Tyneside
- North West Leicestershire
- North Yorkshire
- Northumberland
- Norwich
- Nottingham
- Nuneaton and Bedworth
- Oldham
- Oxford
- Peterborough
- Plymouth
- Portsmouth
- Preston
- Reading
- Redbridge
- Redcar and Cleveland
- Reigate and Banstead
- Richmond upon Thames
- Rochdale
- Rotherham
- Rugby
- Rushcliffe
- Salford
- Sandwell
- Sefton
- Sevenoaks
- Shropshire
- Slough
- Solihull
- Somerset
- South Cambridgeshire
- South Derbyshire
- South Gloucestershire
- South Hams
- South Kesteven
- South Norfolk
- South Oxfordshire
- South Ribble
- South Staffordshire
- South Tyneside
- Southampton
- Southend-on-Sea
- Southwark
- St Albans
- St. Helens
- Stafford
- Stockport
- Stockton-on-Tees
- Stoke-on-Trent
- Stratford-on-Avon
- Stroud
- Sunderland
- Sutton
- Swale
- Swindon
- Tameside
- Teignbridge
- Telford and Wrekin
- Tendring
- Test Valley
- Thanet
- Thurrock
- Tonbridge and Malling
- Torbay
- Tower Hamlets
- Trafford
- Tunbridge Wells
- Vale of White Horse
- Wakefield
- Walsall
- Waltham Forest
- Wandsworth
- Warrington
- Warwick
- Waverley
- Wealden
- Welwyn Hatfield
- West Berkshire
- West Lancashire
- West Northamptonshire
- West Oxfordshire
- West Suffolk
- Westminster
- Westmorland and Furness
- Wigan
- Wiltshire
- Winchester
- Windsor and Maidenhead
- Wirral
- Wokingham
- Wolverhampton
- Worthing
- Wychavon
- Wyre
- York
What this does not mean
Part of what this page would normally show is absent from the published files. Ofcom suppresses output areas with speed information for fewer than five lines, and the local-authority coverage file carries no national row for some measures, so the comparison is dropped rather than approximated. A suppressed cell is never read as zero.
Open a council area inside this nation to see availability and take-up on the same base.
What this page does not show
The comparison with a nation or United Kingdom take-up gap, or with a nation or United Kingdom band mean, is not calculated. Those aggregates are not in the accepted files.
since 2024 we no longer report on speeds at postcode level
the figures provided here can be compared with the ones reported in 2024 but are not directly comparable with the ones from earlier years
We only include output areas with speed information for at least five lines
It does not tell you the speed at your address. No postcode speed has been published since 2024, and this site does not model one.
It does not say a service will work at a given premises. Availability is a modelled count of premises that could order a service, and one address inside a covered postcode can still be unserved.
It does not mix units. Postcodes, premises and active lines are three different things, and a percentage of one is never read as a percentage of another.
It does not read a suppressed figure as zero. Where fewer than five active lines sit behind a cell, Ofcom withholds it and so do we.
It does not compare periods that were not published together. Coverage is January 2026; line performance is July 2025; a difference between them would describe the calendar, not the network.
Source
- Source
- Ofcom Connected Nations coverage and fixed broadband performance
- Coverage period
- January 2026
- Line performance period
- July 2025
- Publisher release
- Spring 2026 r2 and Connected Nations 2025 performance
- Coverage file SHA-256
- 0ddc33723e345d86ba25d7528d272f6fe12aef5d21d2e3adefdcaa53711c76f3
- Calculation release
- ofcom-2026-10-18-0ddc33723e34-09c7e7c1be2e
Download this page’s aggregate CSV · Read this page’s calculation data · read how the figures are calculated